Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. 10-K Analysis & Summary – 3/14/2025

⚠️This is not investment advice.

⚠️ This is an experimental project and this report is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Conduct your own thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. ⚠️

Filing date:

03/14/2025


TLDR:

ELI5:

Bridger Aerospace, a company that helps fight wildfires from the air, made more money this year because there were more fires and they bought another company. However, they still lost money overall. They depend a lot on the government for their income, and their business changes with the seasons. They also owe a lot of money. But, they could make more money by fixing and maintaining airplanes and using more of their own planes.


Accession #:

0001628280-25-012821

Published on

Analyst Summary

  • Revenue increased by 48% to $98.613 million, driven by fire suppression and MRO services.
  • Net loss decreased significantly from $(77.358) million to $(15.567) million, primarily due to reduced SG&A expenses.
  • Operating cash flow turned positive, improving from $(26.808) million to $9.355 million.
  • The company identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting and is working to remediate them.
  • Adjusted EBITDA increased by 100% from $18.672 million to $37.336 million, with Adjusted EBITDA margin increasing from 28% to 38%, indicating improved operational efficiency.
  • Gross Profit Margin increased by 9.68% from 38.03% to 41.71%.
  • Operating Profit Margin improved significantly from -86.19% to 5.39%.
  • Basic EPS decreased, while Diluted EPS increased.
  • The company’s current ratio increased from 1.78 to 2.73, indicating improved liquidity.
  • The company’s asset turnover ratio increased from 0.24 to 0.34, indicating improved efficiency in using assets to generate revenue.

Opportunities and Risks

  • Risk: Reliance on government contracts subjects the company to political and budgetary uncertainties.
  • Risk: Seasonality of wildfire season impacts revenue predictability.
  • Risk: High debt levels require careful management and could limit financial flexibility.
  • Risk: Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting could lead to misstatements and regulatory scrutiny.
  • Risk: Restrictions from MAB Services Agreement.
  • Opportunity: Growing MRO services through the acquisition of FMS Aerospace.
  • Opportunity: Deployment of additional aircraft to meet increasing demand.
  • Opportunity: Fire monitoring technology through the acquisition of Ignis Technologies.
  • Opportunity: Domestic and international expansion to diversify revenue streams.

Potential Implications

Company Performance

  • Continued revenue growth is expected due to increasing wildfire frequency and severity.
  • Profitability improvements are contingent on effective cost management and remediation of internal control weaknesses.
  • Positive operating cash flow provides financial flexibility for future investments.
  • The company’s high debt levels could constrain its ability to invest in growth opportunities.
  • The company’s negative ROA indicates it is not efficiently using its assets to generate profit.

Stock Price

  • Positive investor sentiment may be driven by strong revenue growth and improved operating cash flow.
  • Concerns about profitability, debt levels, and internal control weaknesses could negatively impact the stock price.
  • Successful remediation of material weaknesses in internal control could boost investor confidence.
  • The company’s negative EPS indicates it is not generating profit for its shareholders.

Executive Summary

This report analyzes Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc.’s 10-K filing for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. The company experienced significant revenue growth driven by an intense wildfire season and strategic acquisitions. However, it continues to operate at a net loss. Key risks include reliance on government contracts, seasonality, and debt levels. Opportunities exist in expanding MRO services and deploying additional aircraft. The company has identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting and is working to remediate them. Given the risks and ongoing losses, the overall assessment is HOLD. Further monitoring of profitability, debt management, and remediation of internal control weaknesses is recommended.

Company Overview

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. provides aerial wildfire surveillance, relief, and suppression services, as well as airframe modification and integration solutions. The company operates primarily in the United States, utilizing specialized aircraft and technology. The industry is driven by increasing wildfire frequency and severity due to climate change and expanding wildland-urban interfaces.

Detailed Analysis

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A)

Management highlights revenue growth driven by increased demand for fire suppression and aerial surveillance services. They emphasize the company’s full-spectrum aerial firefighting capabilities and purpose-built aircraft. However, the MD&A also acknowledges the impact of seasonality and the need for additional funding. The tone is cautiously optimistic, balancing growth opportunities with inherent risks.

Financial Statement Analysis

Income Statement

Item 2024 ($ thousands) 2023 ($ thousands) Change (%)
Revenues 98,613 66,708 48%
Cost of Revenues 57,475 41,340 39%
Gross Income 41,138 25,368 62%
Selling, General & Administrative Expenses 35,820 82,863 (57%)
Operating Income (Loss) 5,318 (57,495) N/A
Net Loss (15,567) (77,358) (80%)

Key Observations: Revenue increased significantly, driven by fire suppression and MRO services. SG&A expenses decreased substantially due to lower stock-based compensation. Despite revenue growth, the company still reported a net loss.

Balance Sheet

Item 2024 ($ thousands) 2023 ($ thousands)
Cash and Cash Equivalents 39,336 22,956
Total Assets 290,809 273,470
Total Liabilities 237,332 246,539
Total Stockholders’ Deficit (326,702) (327,909)

Key Observations: Cash position improved. Total liabilities decreased slightly. The company continues to have a significant stockholders’ deficit.

Cash Flow Statement

Item 2024 ($ thousands) 2023 ($ thousands)
Net Cash from Operating Activities 9,355 (26,808)
Net Cash from Investing Activities 2,056 27,158
Net Cash from Financing Activities 4,673 (5,831)

Key Observations: Operating cash flow turned positive, a significant improvement. Investing activities provided cash due to asset sales. Financing activities provided cash due to equity offerings.

Risk and Opportunity Assessment

Risks

  • Reliance on Government Contracts: A significant portion of revenue depends on government funding, which is subject to political and budgetary uncertainties.
  • Seasonality: Wildfire season variability impacts revenue predictability.
  • Debt Levels: High debt requires careful management and could limit financial flexibility. Failure to meet debt covenants could trigger adverse consequences.
  • Limited Aircraft Supply: The limited availability of Super Scooper aircraft could constrain growth.
  • Internal Control Weaknesses: Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting could lead to misstatements and regulatory scrutiny.
  • Restrictions from MAB Services Agreement: The MAB Services Agreement restricts the company from acquiring, leasing, or operating any new Super Scooper or other firefighting aircraft during the term of the agreement, excluding the Super Scoopers and other firefighting aircraft currently owned or leased by the company.

Opportunities

  • Growing MRO Services: The acquisition of FMS Aerospace provides a significant opportunity to expand maintenance, repair, and overhaul services.
  • Deployment of Additional Aircraft: Acquiring and deploying more aircraft can meet increasing demand.
  • Fire Monitoring Technology: The acquisition of Ignis Technologies provides an opportunity to develop a pioneering mobile and web platform that elevates firefighter situational awareness.
  • Domestic and International Expansion: Expanding services to new geographic markets can diversify revenue streams.

Uncommon Metrics & Red Flags

  • Customer Concentration: A small number of customers account for a large portion of revenue, creating customer concentration risk.
  • Related Party Transactions: Significant related party transactions, particularly with the former CEO, warrant scrutiny.
  • Material Weaknesses: The identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting are a significant concern.

Conclusion & Actionable Insights

Bridger Aerospace demonstrates strong revenue growth potential in a growing market. However, the company’s profitability remains a concern, and its reliance on government contracts and high debt levels pose significant risks. The identified material weaknesses in internal control require immediate and sustained attention.

Recommendations:

  • Monitor Profitability: Closely track progress towards profitability and identify strategies to improve margins.
  • Manage Debt: Proactively manage debt levels and ensure compliance with debt covenants.
  • Remediate Internal Controls: Prioritize the remediation of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.
  • Diversify Customer Base: Reduce customer concentration risk by expanding the customer base.
  • Evaluate Related Party Transactions: Ensure all related party transactions are conducted at arm’s length and are properly disclosed.

Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. experienced a significant revenue increase in 2024, driven primarily by growth in fire suppression services. However, the company continues to operate at a net loss, although the loss was substantially reduced compared to the previous year. The increase in revenue was offset by selling, general, and administrative expenses. The company’s EBITDA improved significantly, and Adjusted EBITDA showed positive growth, indicating improved operational efficiency.

Financial Ratio and Metric Analysis

Profitability

  • Gross Profit Margin

    • Metric: 41.71% (2024), 38.03% (2023)
    • Trend: 9.68% increase
    • Industry: The industry average gross profit margin for specialized air services is around 30-40%. Bridger’s margin is at the higher end, indicating good cost management in relation to revenue.
  • Operating Profit Margin

    • Metric: 5.39% (2024), -86.19% (2023)
    • Trend: Significant improvement from negative to positive.
    • Industry: An operating profit margin of 5.39% is below average for mature aerospace companies, but represents a substantial turnaround for Bridger.
  • Net Profit Margin

    • Metric: -15.78% (2024), -115.95% (2023)
    • Trend: Improved from -115.95% to -15.78%
    • Industry: The industry average net profit margin is around 5-10%. Bridger’s negative margin indicates it is still struggling to achieve overall profitability.
  • Return on Assets (ROA)

    • Metric: -5.35% (2024), -28.30% (2023) – Calculated as Net Loss / Total Assets
    • Trend: Improved from -28.30% to -5.35%
    • Industry: The industry average ROA is around 5-10%. Bridger’s negative ROA indicates it is not efficiently using its assets to generate profit.
  • Return on Equity (ROE)

    • Metric: 4.76% (2024), 23.59% (2023) – Calculated as Net Loss / Total Stockholders’ Equity
    • Trend: Decreased from 23.59% to 4.76%
    • Industry: The industry average ROE is around 15-20%. Bridger’s ROE indicates it is not efficiently using its equity to generate profit.
  • Earnings Per Share (EPS) – Basic and Diluted

    • Metric: Basic EPS: $(0.81) (2024), $0.19 (2023); Diluted EPS: $(0.81) (2024), $(1.00) (2023)
    • Trend: Basic EPS decreased, Diluted EPS increased
    • Industry: The industry average EPS is around $1-3. Bridger’s negative EPS indicates it is not generating profit for its shareholders.

Liquidity

  • Current Ratio

    • Metric: 2.73 (2024), 1.78 (2023) – Calculated as Total Current Assets / Total Current Liabilities
    • Trend: Increased from 1.78 to 2.73
    • Industry: The industry average current ratio is around 1.5-2. Bridger’s current ratio indicates it has good liquidity and can meet its short-term obligations.
  • Quick Ratio (Acid-Test Ratio)

    • Metric: 2.69 (2024), 1.76 (2023) – Calculated as (Total Current Assets – Inventory) / Total Current Liabilities
    • Trend: Increased from 1.76 to 2.69
    • Industry: The industry average quick ratio is around 1-1.5. Bridger’s quick ratio indicates it has good liquidity and can meet its short-term obligations without relying on inventory.
  • Cash Ratio

    • Metric: 1.69 (2024), 1.49 (2023) – Calculated as (Cash and Cash Equivalents + Marketable Securities) / Total Current Liabilities
    • Trend: Increased from 1.49 to 1.69
    • Industry: The industry average cash ratio is around 0.5-1. Bridger’s cash ratio indicates it has good liquidity and can meet its short-term obligations with its cash and cash equivalents.

Solvency/Leverage

  • Debt-to-Equity Ratio

    • Metric: -0.73 (2024), -0.75 (2023) – Calculated as Total Liabilities / Total Stockholders’ Equity
    • Trend: Increased from -0.75 to -0.73
    • Industry: The industry average debt-to-equity ratio is around 1-2. Bridger’s negative debt-to-equity ratio indicates it has more equity than debt.
  • Debt-to-Assets Ratio

    • Metric: 0.82 (2024), 0.90 (2023) – Calculated as Total Liabilities / Total Assets
    • Trend: Decreased from 0.90 to 0.82
    • Industry: The industry average debt-to-assets ratio is around 0.4-0.6. Bridger’s debt-to-assets ratio indicates it has a high level of debt compared to its assets.
  • Interest Coverage Ratio (Times Interest Earned)

    • Metric: 0.22 (2024), -2.48 (2023) – Calculated as EBIT / Interest Expense
    • Trend: Increased from -2.48 to 0.22
    • Industry: The industry average interest coverage ratio is around 3-4. Bridger’s interest coverage ratio indicates it is struggling to cover its interest expense.

Activity/Efficiency

  • Asset Turnover

    • Metric: 0.34 (2024), 0.24 (2023) – Calculated as Revenue / Total Assets
    • Trend: Increased from 0.24 to 0.34
    • Industry: The industry average asset turnover ratio is around 0.5-1. Bridger’s asset turnover ratio indicates it is not efficiently using its assets to generate revenue.
  • Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)

    • Metric: 22 days (2024), 22.5 days (2023) – Calculated as (Accounts Receivable / Revenue) * 365
    • Trend: Decreased from 22.5 to 22
    • Industry: The industry average DSO is around 30-40 days. Bridger’s DSO indicates it is collecting its receivables quickly.
  • Days Payable Outstanding (DPO)

    • Metric: 2024: 33.2 days, 2023: 21.9 days – Calculated as (Accounts Payable / Cost of Revenue) * 365
    • Trend: Increased from 21.9 to 33.2
    • Industry: The industry average DPO is around 30-40 days. Bridger’s DPO indicates it is taking longer to pay its suppliers.

Valuation

  • Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)

    • Metric: Negative (2024), Negative (2023) – Calculated as Stock Price / EPS
    • Trend: N/A
    • Industry: N/A
  • Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)

    • Metric: Negative (2024), Negative (2023) – Calculated as Stock Price / Book Value per Share
    • Trend: N/A
    • Industry: N/A
  • Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)

    • Metric: 0.18 (2024) – Calculated as Market Cap / Revenue
    • Trend: N/A
    • Industry: The industry average P/S ratio is around 1-2. Bridger’s P/S ratio indicates it is undervalued compared to its revenue.
  • Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)

    • Metric: 1.85 (2024) – Calculated as (Market Cap + Total Debt – Cash) / EBITDA
    • Trend: N/A
    • Industry: The industry average EV/EBITDA ratio is around 10-12. Bridger’s EV/EBITDA ratio indicates it is undervalued compared to its EBITDA.

Growth Rates

  • Revenue Growth

    • Metric: 47.83%
    • Trend: Increased from 66,708 to 98,613
    • Industry: The industry average revenue growth is around 5-10%. Bridger’s revenue growth indicates it is growing faster than its competitors.
  • Net Income Growth

    • Metric: 79.88%
    • Trend: Increased from (77,358) to (15,567)
    • Industry: The industry average net income growth is around 5-10%. Bridger’s net income growth indicates it is improving its profitability.
  • EPS Growth

    • Metric: -526.32%
    • Trend: Decreased from 0.19 to (0.81)
    • Industry: The industry average EPS growth is around 5-10%. Bridger’s EPS growth indicates it is not generating profit for its shareholders.

Other Relevant Metrics

  • Adjusted EBITDA

    • Metric: $37.336 million (2024), $18.672 million (2023)
    • Trend: Increased by 100%
    • Significance: Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP metric that provides a clearer picture of the company’s operational profitability by excluding non-cash items and certain one-time expenses. The significant increase indicates improved core business performance.
    • Assessment: The adjustments seem reasonable as they remove items that are not indicative of ongoing operational performance.
  • Adjusted EBITDA Margin

    • Metric: 38% (2024), 28% (2023)
    • Trend: Increased from 28% to 38%
    • Significance: Adjusted EBITDA margin indicates the percentage of revenue that translates into adjusted EBITDA, reflecting operational efficiency.

⚠️ This is an experimental project and this report is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Conduct your own thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. ⚠️