Concrete Leveling Systems Inc 10-Q Analysis & Summary – 3/14/2025

⚠️This is not investment advice.

⚠️ This is an experimental project and this report is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Conduct your own thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. ⚠️

Filing date:

03/14/2025


TLDR:

ELI5:

This company is losing money and might not be able to stay in business. They depend on loans from their owners and have problems with how they manage their finances.


Accession #:

0001477932-25-001717

Published on

Analyst Summary

  • Revenue saw a slight increase, but operating expenses drove a higher net loss.
  • Management acknowledges material weaknesses in internal controls.
  • The company is heavily reliant on advances from stockholders to fund operations.
  • The auditor’s opinion raises substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
  • Gross Profit Margin decreased from 78.55% to 77.59%.
  • Operating Profit Margin increased from -113.59% to -104.94%.
  • Net Profit Margin increased from -132.57% to -121.75%.
  • ROA increased from -195.31% to -187.26%.
  • ROE decreased from 6.87% to 6.27%.
  • EPS remained constant at -$0.00.
  • Current Ratio remained constant at 0.03.
  • Quick Ratio increased from 0.003 to 0.005.
  • Cash Ratio decreased from 0.002 to 0.001.
  • Debt-to-Equity Ratio remained constant at -1.03.
  • Debt-to-Assets Ratio decreased from 31.02 to 30.85.
  • Interest Coverage Ratio decreased from -5.98 to -6.24.
  • Inventory Turnover decreased from 0.007 to 0.004.
  • DPO decreased from 86,744 to 73,608.
  • Asset Turnover decreased from 0.029 to 0.016.
  • P/E Ratio is not meaningful due to the company’s negative earnings.
  • The negative P/B ratio is a result of the negative book value of equity.
  • A very high P/S ratio suggests the company is significantly overvalued relative to its sales.
  • The negative EV/EBITDA ratio is not meaningful due to the negative EBITDA.
  • Revenue Growth is 12%.
  • Net Income Growth is 2.86%.
  • EPS Growth is N/A.

Opportunities and Risks

  • Opportunity: Potential expansion into the gaming and hospitality industry through an agreement with Jericho Associates, Inc.
  • Risk: Significant reliance on stockholder advances and rent-free use of facilities from stockholders raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the sustainability of these arrangements.
  • Risk: Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.
  • Risk: Low cash balance and negative equity.
  • Risk: High debt-to-assets ratio indicates that the company’s assets are primarily financed through debt, posing a significant risk.

Potential Implications

Company Performance

  • Continued operating losses and working capital usage.
  • Inability to secure funding from traditional sources.
  • Increased risk of errors and fraud in financial reporting due to internal control deficiencies.

Stock Price

  • The risks associated with CLEV outweigh any potential rewards at this time.
  • The company’s financial instability and going concern issues may negatively impact the stock price.

SEC Filing Report: Concrete Leveling Systems, Inc. (CLEV) – Form 10-Q for the Period Ended January 31, 2025

Executive Summary

This report analyzes Concrete Leveling Systems, Inc.’s (CLEV) Form 10-Q filing for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2025. The company continues to struggle with profitability and faces significant going concern issues. While revenue saw a slight increase, operating expenses, particularly legal and professional fees, drove a higher net loss compared to the same period last year. Critically, management acknowledges material weaknesses in internal controls. The company’s reliance on stockholder advances for financing remains a significant risk. Given the financial instability, material weaknesses in internal controls, and going concern issues, a **sell** recommendation is warranted. The company needs to secure additional funding and address its internal control deficiencies to improve its long-term viability.

Company Overview

Concrete Leveling Systems, Inc. (CLEV) manufactures and sells specialized equipment for the concrete leveling industry. The company operates under the trade name CLS Fabricating, Inc. A significant aspect of their business strategy involves a potential expansion into the gaming and hospitality industry through an agreement with Jericho Associates, Inc., contingent upon regulatory approvals and financing for a casino and hotel resort project. The company is classified as a smaller reporting company.

Detailed Analysis

Financial Statement Analysis

Metric Three Months Ended Jan 31, 2025 Three Months Ended Jan 31, 2024 Six Months Ended Jan 31, 2025 Six Months Ended Jan 31, 2024 Change (6 Months)
Revenue $125 $100 $308 $275 12.0%
Cost of Sales $10 $0 $69 $59 16.9%
Gross Margin $115 $100 $239 $216 10.6%
Legal & Professional Fees $7,450 $5,670 $27,404 $26,646 2.8%
Selling, General & Admin $2,777 $2,083 $5,155 $4,806 7.3%
Total Operating Expenses $10,227 $7,753 $32,559 $31,452 3.5%
Loss from Operations ($10,112) ($7,653) ($32,320) ($31,236) 3.5%
Interest Expense ($2,584) ($2,619) ($5,179) ($5,220) -0.8%
Net Loss ($12,696) ($10,272) ($37,499) ($36,456) 2.9%
Cash $677 N/A $677 $514 31.7%

Key Observations:

  • Revenue Growth: Modest revenue growth is observed, but it’s insufficient to offset operating expenses.
  • Expense Increase: Legal and professional fees are a significant driver of increased operating expenses and net losses.
  • Liquidity Crisis: The company’s cash position is critically low, raising serious concerns about its ability to meet short-term obligations.
  • Reliance on Stockholder Advances: The company is heavily reliant on advances from stockholders to fund operations, which is not a sustainable long-term strategy.
  • Negative Equity: The company has a significant stockholders’ deficit, indicating that liabilities far exceed assets.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A)

Management acknowledges the going concern issue and attributes it to substantial operating losses and working capital usage. They express optimism about the potential gaming and hospitality business but admit the need for additional funding through debt or equity. The MD&A highlights the increased revenue due to higher parts sales and increased operating expenses due to higher accounting and auditing fees. The forward-looking statements are boilerplate and provide little concrete information about specific strategies to address the company’s challenges.

Red Flags:

  • Going Concern: The auditor’s opinion raising substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern is a major red flag.
  • Material Weaknesses in Internal Controls: Management’s admission of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting is concerning. These weaknesses include inadequate segregation of duties, lack of a code of ethics, lack of a whistleblower policy, lack of an independent board of directors or board committees related to financial reporting, and lack of multiple levels of supervision and review.
  • Dependence on Related Party Transactions: Significant reliance on stockholder advances and rent-free use of facilities from stockholders raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the sustainability of these arrangements.

Uncommon Metrics

  • Accrued Interest – Stockholders: The significant amount of accrued interest owed to stockholders ($51,912) further strains the company’s financial resources.
  • Advances – Stockholders: The large balance of advances from stockholders ($351,239) highlights the company’s inability to secure funding from traditional sources.

Conclusion and Actionable Insights

Concrete Leveling Systems, Inc. faces significant financial challenges. The company’s low cash balance, reliance on stockholder advances, negative equity, and material weaknesses in internal controls paint a concerning picture. While management expresses optimism about future prospects, the current financial situation and the auditor’s going concern opinion warrant a **sell** recommendation.

Recommendations:

  • Avoid Investment: The risks associated with CLEV outweigh any potential rewards at this time.
  • Monitor Closely: If already invested, closely monitor the company’s ability to secure funding and address its internal control deficiencies.
  • Seek Professional Advice: Consult with a financial advisor to determine the best course of action based on individual circumstances.

Commentary

Concrete Leveling Systems, Inc. is facing significant financial challenges. The company continues to operate at a net loss, with minimal revenue generation and substantial reliance on stockholder advances and notes payable. While revenue increased slightly compared to the previous year, operating and other expenses continue to erode profitability. The company’s negative stockholders’ deficit and reliance on debt financing from stockholders raise concerns about its long-term solvency and ability to sustain operations.

Financial Ratio and Metric Analysis

Profitability

  • Gross Profit Margin

    • Metric: For the six months ended January 31, 2025: ($239/$308) = 77.59%. For the six months ended January 31, 2024: ($216/$275) = 78.55%.
    • Trend: Gross Profit Margin decreased from 78.55% to 77.59%, a decrease of 1.22%.
    • Industry: The construction industry typically has gross profit margins ranging from 25% to 40%. Concrete Leveling Systems’ gross profit margin is significantly higher, which could be due to the specific nature of their services or potentially due to how cost of sales is classified.
  • Operating Profit Margin

    • Metric: For the six months ended January 31, 2025: (-$32,320/$308) = -104.94%. For the six months ended January 31, 2024: (-$31,236/$275) = -113.59%.
    • Trend: Operating Profit Margin increased from -113.59% to -104.94%, an increase of 7.59%.
    • Industry: Given the company’s operating losses, comparing to industry averages is not particularly relevant. The negative margin indicates significant operational inefficiencies.
  • Net Profit Margin

    • Metric: For the six months ended January 31, 2025: (-$37,499/$308) = -121.75%. For the six months ended January 31, 2024: (-$36,456/$275) = -132.57%.
    • Trend: Net Profit Margin increased from -132.57% to -121.75%, an increase of 8.16%.
    • Industry: Similar to the operating profit margin, the negative net profit margin highlights the company’s inability to generate profits.
  • Return on Assets (ROA)

    • Metric: Net Loss (6 months ended Jan 31, 2025) / Total Assets (Jan 31, 2025): (-$37,499 / $20,025) = -187.26%. Net Loss (6 months ended Jan 31, 2024) / Total Assets (July 31, 2024): (-$36,456 / $18,666) = -195.31%.
    • Trend: ROA increased from -195.31% to -187.26%, an increase of 4.12%.
    • Industry: A negative ROA is indicative of poor asset utilization and profitability. The construction industry generally aims for a positive ROA, typically in the range of 5% to 10%.
  • Return on Equity (ROE)

    • Metric: Net Loss (6 months ended Jan 31, 2025) / Total Stockholders’ Deficit (Jan 31, 2025): (-$37,499 / -$597,758) = 6.27%. Net Loss (6 months ended Jan 31, 2024) / Total Stockholders’ Deficit (Jan 31, 2024): (-$36,456 / -$530,730) = 6.87%.
    • Trend: ROE decreased from 6.87% to 6.27%, a decrease of 8.73%.
    • Industry: A positive ROE is generally desired, but in this case, it is positive due to the negative equity.
  • Earnings Per Share (EPS) – Basic and Diluted

    • Metric: For the six months ended January 31, 2025: -$0.00. For the six months ended January 31, 2024: -$0.00.
    • Trend: EPS remained constant at -$0.00.
    • Industry: The negative EPS reflects the company’s unprofitability.

Liquidity

  • Current Ratio

    • Metric: January 31, 2025: $20,025 / $617,783 = 0.03. July 31, 2024: $18,666 / $578,925 = 0.03.
    • Trend: Current Ratio remained constant at 0.03.
    • Industry: A current ratio below 1 indicates potential liquidity issues. The construction industry typically aims for a current ratio between 1.5 and 2.5.
  • Quick Ratio (Acid-Test Ratio)

    • Metric: (Current Assets – Inventory) / Current Liabilities. January 31, 2025: ($20,025 – $16,817) / $617,783 = 0.005. July 31, 2024: ($18,666 – $16,876) / $578,925 = 0.003.
    • Trend: Quick Ratio increased from 0.003 to 0.005, an increase of 66.67%.
    • Industry: A quick ratio significantly below 1 suggests the company may struggle to meet its short-term obligations without relying on inventory sales.
  • Cash Ratio

    • Metric: Cash / Current Liabilities. January 31, 2025: $677 / $617,783 = 0.001. July 31, 2024: $887 / $578,925 = 0.002.
    • Trend: Cash Ratio decreased from 0.002 to 0.001, a decrease of 50%.
    • Industry: This extremely low cash ratio indicates a severe lack of liquid assets to cover current liabilities.

Solvency/Leverage

  • Debt-to-Equity Ratio

    • Metric: Total Liabilities / Total Stockholders’ Deficit. January 31, 2025: $617,783 / (-$597,758) = -1.03. July 31, 2024: $578,925 / (-$560,259) = -1.03.
    • Trend: Debt-to-Equity Ratio remained constant at -1.03.
    • Industry: The negative ratio is due to the negative equity.
  • Debt-to-Assets Ratio

    • Metric: Total Liabilities / Total Assets. January 31, 2025: $617,783 / $20,025 = 30.85. July 31, 2024: $578,925 / $18,666 = 31.02.
    • Trend: Debt-to-Assets Ratio decreased from 31.02 to 30.85, a decrease of 0.55%.
    • Industry: A very high debt-to-assets ratio indicates that the company’s assets are primarily financed through debt, posing a significant risk.
  • Interest Coverage Ratio (Times Interest Earned)

    • Metric: Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) / Interest Expense. For the six months ended January 31, 2025: (-$32,320) / $5,179 = -6.24. For the six months ended January 31, 2024: (-$31,236) / $5,220 = -5.98.
    • Trend: Interest Coverage Ratio decreased from -5.98 to -6.24, a decrease of 4.35%.
    • Industry: A negative interest coverage ratio indicates the company is unable to cover its interest expenses with its operating income, signaling financial distress.

Activity/Efficiency

  • Inventory Turnover

    • Metric: Cost of Sales / Average Inventory. For the six months ended January 31, 2025: $69 / (($16,817 + $16,876)/2) = 0.004. For the six months ended January 31, 2024: $59 / (($16,876 + $0)/2) = 0.007.
    • Trend: Inventory Turnover decreased from 0.007 to 0.004, a decrease of 42.86%.
    • Industry: A very low inventory turnover suggests that the company is not efficiently managing its inventory.
  • Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)

    • Metric: (Average Accounts Receivable / Revenue) * 365. Since accounts receivable is not provided, this cannot be calculated.
  • Days Payable Outstanding (DPO)

    • Metric: (Average Accounts Payable / Cost of Sales) * 365. Average Accounts Payable = ($27,665 + $28,038) / 2 = $27,851.5. For the six months ended January 31, 2025: ($27,851.5 / $69) * 182.5 = 73,608. For the six months ended January 31, 2024: ($28,038 / $59) * 182.5 = 86,744.
    • Trend: DPO decreased from 86,744 to 73,608, a decrease of 15.14%.
    • Industry: A very high DPO indicates the company is taking a long time to pay its suppliers, which could strain relationships.
  • Asset Turnover

    • Metric: Revenue / Average Total Assets. For the six months ended January 31, 2025: $308 / (($20,025 + $18,666)/2) = 0.016. For the six months ended January 31, 2024: $275 / (($18,666 + $0)/2) = 0.029.
    • Trend: Asset Turnover decreased from 0.029 to 0.016, a decrease of 44.83%.
    • Industry: A low asset turnover ratio suggests the company is not efficiently utilizing its assets to generate revenue.

Valuation

  • Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)

    • Metric: Stock Price / EPS. Stock price is $2.20. To estimate annual EPS, we can double the six-month loss per share: -$0.00 * 2 = -$0.00. P/E Ratio: $2.20 / (-$0.00) = N/A (Not Applicable due to negative earnings).
    • Industry: P/E ratio is not meaningful due to the company’s negative earnings.
  • Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)

    • Metric: Market Cap / Book Value of Equity. Market Cap = Shares Outstanding * Stock Price = 14,027,834 * $2.20 = $30,861,234.80. Book Value of Equity = -$597,758. P/B Ratio = $30,861,234.80 / (-$597,758) = -51.63.
    • Industry: The negative P/B ratio is a result of the negative book value of equity.
  • Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)

    • Metric: Market Cap / Annual Revenue. Annual Revenue is estimated by doubling the six-month revenue: $308 * 2 = $616. P/S Ratio = $30,861,234.80 / $616 = 50,100.99.
    • Industry: A very high P/S ratio suggests the company is significantly overvalued relative to its sales.
  • Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)

    • Metric: EV = Market Cap + Total Debt – Cash. Market Cap = $30,861,234.80. Total Debt = $51,912 (Accrued interest – stockholders) + $351,239 (Advances – stockholders) + $186,967 (Notes payable – stockholders) = $590,118. Cash = $677. EV = $30,861,234.80 + $590,118 – $677 = $31,450,675.80. EBITDA = Net Loss + Interest Expense + Taxes + Depreciation and Amortization = -$37,499 + $5,179 + $0 + $0 = -$32,320. EV/EBITDA = $31,450,675.80 / (-$32,320) = -973.16.
    • Industry: The negative EV/EBITDA ratio is not meaningful due to the negative EBITDA.

Growth Rates

  • Revenue Growth

    • Metric: (Current Period Revenue – Prior Period Revenue) / Prior Period Revenue. For the six months ended January 31, 2025 and 2024: ($308 – $275) / $275 = 12%.
    • Trend: Revenue Growth is 12%.
  • Net Income Growth

    • Metric: (Current Period Net Income – Prior Period Net Income) / Prior Period Net Income. For the six months ended January 31, 2025 and 2024: (-$37,499 – (-$36,456)) / (-$36,456) = 2.86%.
    • Trend: Net Income Growth is 2.86%.
  • EPS Growth

    • Metric: (Current Period EPS – Prior Period EPS) / Prior Period EPS. For the six months ended January 31, 2025 and 2024: (-$0.00 – (-$0.00)) / (-$0.00) = N/A.
    • Trend: EPS Growth is N/A.

Other Relevant Metrics

  • The company relies heavily on advances and notes payable from stockholders to fund its operations. This is evident from the significant amounts reported as “Advances – stockholders” and “Notes payable – stockholders” in the balance sheets. This reliance on related-party funding raises concerns about the company’s ability to attract external financing and its long-term sustainability.
  • The company acknowledges significant deficiencies in its internal controls, including inadequate segregation of duties, lack of a code of ethics, lack of a whistleblower policy, lack of an independent board of directors, and lack of multiple levels of supervision and review. These deficiencies increase the risk of errors and fraud in financial reporting.

⚠️ This is an experimental project and this report is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Conduct your own thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. ⚠️