SIGMATRON INTERNATIONAL INC 8-K Analysis & Summary – 3/14/2025

⚠️This is not investment advice.

⚠️ This is an experimental project and this report is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Conduct your own thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. ⚠️

Filing date:

03/14/2025


TLDR:

SigmaTron International, Inc. reported its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal 2025, with decreased revenues but increased net income due to a sale/leaseback transaction.

ELI5:

The company sold some of its assets and leased them back, which made them look profitable for the quarter, even though their sales were down. They’re hoping sales will go up next quarter, but it’s not clear if they can keep this up.


Accession #:

0001171843-25-001482

Published on

Analyst Summary

  • Revenue decreased by 26% compared to the same quarter last year, and 21% for the nine-month period.
  • Gross profit margin decreased from 10.35% to 7.81% for the quarter, indicating pricing pressure or increased costs.
  • Net income for Q3 2025 increased primarily due to a $7.2 million gain from a sale/leaseback transaction; without this, the company would have reported a loss.
  • The nine-month period shows a significant net loss.
  • Management claims cost-cutting efforts are taking effect and anticipates higher revenue in Q4 based on current backlog.
  • Management expresses concerns about existing and potential new tariff policies.
  • The company is working with Lincoln International on strategic initiatives.

Opportunities and Risks

  • Risk: Continued revenue decline could lead to further losses and financial instability.
  • Risk: Economic slowdown could negatively impact demand.
  • Risk: Changes in tariff policies could significantly impact the company’s supply chain and profitability.
  • Risk: Dependence on certain significant customers poses a risk.
  • Risk: Continued disruptions in the global supply chain could impact the availability and cost of necessary components and materials.
  • Opportunity: Cost-cutting efforts could improve profitability if revenue stabilizes or increases.
  • Opportunity: Normalization of the electronic component marketplace could lead to more stable pricing and increased demand.
  • Opportunity: Strategic initiatives being explored with Lincoln International could lead to new growth opportunities.
  • Opportunity: Successful inventory reduction improves cash flow and reduces working capital requirements.

Potential Implications

Company Performance

  • Continued revenue decline could lead to further losses and financial instability.
  • Reliance on one-time gains to achieve profitability is unsustainable.
  • Cost-cutting measures may improve profitability if revenue stabilizes.
  • Strategic initiatives could lead to new growth opportunities.

Stock Price

  • Continued revenue decline could negatively impact the stock price.
  • Positive Q4 results and successful strategic initiatives could improve investor confidence and increase the stock price.
  • Uncertainty regarding tariff policies could create volatility in the stock price.

SEC Filing Report: SigmaTron International, Inc. – Form 8-K (March 14, 2025)

Executive Summary

This report analyzes SigmaTron International, Inc.’s (SGMA) Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2025, pertaining to their Q3 Fiscal Year 2025 results. The company reported a significant revenue decrease of 26% compared to the same quarter last year, but a substantial increase in net income primarily due to a sale/leaseback transaction. Management indicates cost-cutting measures are taking effect and anticipates revenue growth in Q4. However, the underlying business performance remains weak, and reliance on one-time gains raises concerns. **Overall Assessment: Hold.** While cost-cutting and potential revenue recovery are positive, the dependence on a sale/leaseback for profitability and the continued revenue decline warrant caution.

Company Overview

SigmaTron International, Inc. is an electronic manufacturing services (EMS) provider specializing in printed circuit board assemblies, electro-mechanical subassemblies, and complete electronic products. They operate manufacturing facilities in the US, Mexico, China, and Vietnam. The EMS industry is highly competitive and sensitive to economic conditions and global supply chain dynamics.

Detailed Analysis

1. Financial Statement Analysis

a. Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended January 31, 2025 (USD) Three Months Ended January 31, 2024 (USD) Nine Months Ended January 31, 2025 (USD) Nine Months Ended January 31, 2024 (USD)
Net Sales 71,067,863 95,919,888 230,564,201 292,741,928
Cost of Products Sold 65,514,800 85,992,928 211,701,740 263,475,993
Gross Profit 5,553,063 9,926,960 18,862,461 29,265,935
Selling and Administrative Expenses 6,378,141 6,683,488 19,372,518 20,139,927
Operating (Loss) Income (825,078) 3,243,472 (510,057) 9,126,008
Net Income/(Loss) 3,883,611 599,006 (8,872,218) 889,367
Net income/(loss) per common share – basic 0.63 0.10 (1.44) 0.15
Net income/(loss) per common share – diluted 0.63 0.10 (1.44) 0.14

Key Observations:

  • Revenue Decline: A significant decrease in revenue for both the three-month (26%) and nine-month (21%) periods is a major concern.
  • Gross Profit Margin: Gross profit margin decreased significantly from 10.35% in Q3 2024 to 7.81% in Q3 2025. This indicates pricing pressure or increased costs of goods sold.
  • Net Income Improvement (Q3): The increase in net income for Q3 2025 is primarily due to a $7.2 million gain from a sale/leaseback transaction. Without this, the company would have reported a loss.
  • Net Loss (9 Months): The nine-month period shows a significant net loss, highlighting the overall poor performance.
  • EPS: EPS is significantly impacted by the sale/leaseback in Q3, but the nine-month EPS reflects the overall loss.

b. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

January 31, 2025 (USD) April 30, 2024 (USD)
Current Assets 150,288,638 175,902,619
Total Assets 192,987,114 223,793,975
Current Liabilities 122,446,752 145,888,791
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity 192,987,114 223,793,975
Stockholders’ Equity 57,553,519 66,072,253

Key Observations:

  • Asset Reduction: Total assets have decreased significantly, primarily driven by a reduction in current assets. This could be due to decreased sales and inventory management.
  • Liability Reduction: Current liabilities have also decreased, potentially reflecting improved working capital management or delayed payments.
  • Stockholders’ Equity Decline: Stockholders’ equity has decreased, reflecting the net losses incurred during the nine-month period.

c. Key Ratios

  • Gross Profit Margin (Q3 2025): 7.81% (5,553,063 / 71,067,863)
  • Gross Profit Margin (Q3 2024): 10.35% (9,926,960 / 95,919,888)
  • Operating Margin (Q3 2025): -1.16% (-825,078 / 71,067,863)
  • Operating Margin (Q3 2024): 3.38% (3,243,472 / 95,919,888)

2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) Insights

  • Revenue Depression: Management acknowledges the depressed revenue levels and attributes part of it to the holiday period.
  • Sale/Leaseback Impact: They explicitly state that the Q3 profit was “helped” by the sale/leaseback transaction.
  • Cost Structure Reduction: Management claims to be seeing the benefits of cost-cutting efforts, evidenced by an operating profit in January 2025.
  • Positive Signs: They mention normalization in the electronic component marketplace and modest increases in demand.
  • Q4 Outlook: Based on current backlog, they expect higher revenue in Q4 compared to Q3.
  • Inventory Reduction: They successfully reduced inventory in Q3.
  • Tariff Concerns: They express concerns about existing and potential new tariff policies.
  • Strategic Initiatives: They are working with Lincoln International on strategic initiatives.

Red Flags:

  • Reliance on Sale/Leaseback: The dependence on a one-time gain to achieve profitability is a significant red flag. It masks the underlying weakness in the core business.
  • Tariff Uncertainty: The mention of tariff policies creating volatility is a concern, given the company’s international footprint.

3. Comparative and Trend Analysis

Compared to the previous year, SigmaTron is experiencing a significant downturn in revenue and profitability. While management points to positive signs and cost-cutting benefits, the reliance on a sale/leaseback to achieve profitability in Q3 raises serious questions about the sustainability of their business model. The anticipated revenue increase in Q4 needs to be carefully monitored to assess whether it represents a genuine recovery or a temporary blip.

4. Risk and Opportunity Assessment

Risks:

  • Continued Revenue Decline: The primary risk is the continued decline in revenue, which could lead to further losses and financial instability.
  • Economic Conditions: The company is tied to general economic conditions, and a further slowdown could negatively impact demand.
  • Tariff Policies: Changes in tariff policies could significantly impact the company’s supply chain and profitability.
  • Customer Concentration: The company’s dependence on certain significant customers is a risk, as the loss of a major customer could have a material adverse effect.
  • Global Supply Chain Disruptions: Continued disruptions in the global supply chain could impact the availability and cost of necessary components and materials.

Opportunities:

  • Cost-Cutting Measures: The company’s cost-cutting efforts could improve profitability if revenue stabilizes or increases.
  • Normalization of Component Market: The normalization of the electronic component marketplace could lead to more stable pricing and increased demand.
  • Strategic Initiatives: The strategic initiatives being explored with Lincoln International could lead to new growth opportunities.
  • Inventory Reduction: Successful inventory reduction improves cash flow and reduces working capital requirements.

Conclusion and Actionable Insights

SigmaTron International is facing significant challenges, as evidenced by the substantial revenue decline and reliance on a sale/leaseback transaction for profitability. While management expresses optimism about cost-cutting measures and potential revenue recovery, the underlying business performance remains weak.

Recommendations:

  • Monitor Q4 Performance: Closely monitor the company’s Q4 results to assess whether the anticipated revenue increase materializes and is sustainable.
  • Assess Cost-Cutting Impact: Evaluate the effectiveness of the cost-cutting measures and their impact on profitability.
  • Evaluate Strategic Initiatives: Seek more information about the strategic initiatives being explored with Lincoln International and their potential impact on the company’s future growth.
  • Monitor Tariff Developments: Closely monitor developments in tariff policies and their potential impact on the company’s supply chain and profitability.

Given the current situation, a Hold rating is appropriate. Further evidence of a sustainable turnaround is needed before considering a more positive outlook.

Commentary

Sigmatron International’s financial performance shows a mixed picture. While the company experienced a decrease in net sales for both the three-month and nine-month periods ending January 31, 2025, compared to the same periods in 2024, it achieved net income for the quarter, a significant turnaround from the net loss in the nine-month period. This quarterly profitability was driven by other income and a change in the fair value of warrants. However, the overall year-to-date performance remains weak, with a substantial net loss. The company’s balance sheet also reflects a decrease in total assets and stockholders’ equity.

Financial Ratio and Metric Analysis

Profitability

Gross Profit Margin

  • Metric:
    • Three Months Ended January 31, 2025: 5,553,063 / 71,067,863 = 7.81%
    • Three Months Ended January 31, 2024: 9,926,960 / 95,919,888 = 10.35%
    • Nine Months Ended January 31, 2025: 18,862,461 / 230,564,201 = 8.18%
    • Nine Months Ended January 31, 2024: 29,265,935 / 292,741,928 = 10.00%
  • Trend:
    • The gross profit margin decreased from 10.35% to 7.81% for the three-month period, representing a -24.54% change.
    • The gross profit margin decreased from 10.00% to 8.18% for the nine-month period, representing a -18.20% change.
  • Industry: The average gross profit margin for electronic component manufacturers typically ranges from 20% to 30%. Sigmatron’s gross profit margin is significantly lower, indicating potential issues with cost control or pricing strategy.

Operating Profit Margin

  • Metric:
    • Three Months Ended January 31, 2025: (825,078) / 71,067,863 = -1.16%
    • Three Months Ended January 31, 2024: 3,243,472 / 95,919,888 = 3.38%
    • Nine Months Ended January 31, 2025: (510,057) / 230,564,201 = -0.22%
    • Nine Months Ended January 31, 2024: 9,126,008 / 292,741,928 = 3.12%
  • Trend:
    • The operating profit margin decreased from 3.38% to -1.16% for the three-month period, representing a -134.32% change.
    • The operating profit margin decreased from 3.12% to -0.22% for the nine-month period, representing a -107.05% change.
  • Industry: The average operating profit margin for electronic component manufacturers is around 5% to 10%. Sigmatron’s negative operating profit margin indicates operational inefficiencies.

Net Profit Margin

  • Metric:
    • Three Months Ended January 31, 2025: 3,883,611 / 71,067,863 = 5.46%
    • Three Months Ended January 31, 2024: 599,006 / 95,919,888 = 0.62%
    • Nine Months Ended January 31, 2025: (8,872,218) / 230,564,201 = -3.85%
    • Nine Months Ended January 31, 2024: 889,367 / 292,741,928 = 0.30%
  • Trend:
    • The net profit margin increased from 0.62% to 5.46% for the three-month period, representing a 780.65% change.
    • The net profit margin decreased from 0.30% to -3.85% for the nine-month period, representing a -1383.33% change.
  • Industry: The average net profit margin for electronic component manufacturers is around 3% to 7%. Sigmatron’s quarterly net profit margin is within this range, but the year-to-date performance is below average.

Return on Assets (ROA)

  • Metric:
    • ROA = Net Income / Total Assets
    • To annualize the quarterly net income, we multiply it by 4: 3,883,611 * 4 = 15,534,444
    • Estimated Annual ROA = 15,534,444 / 192,987,114 = 8.05%
    • To annualize the quarterly net income, we multiply it by 4: 599,006 * 4 = 2,396,024
    • Estimated Annual ROA = 2,396,024 / 223,793,975 = 1.07%
  • Trend:
    • The estimated annual ROA increased from 1.07% to 8.05%.
  • Industry: The average ROA for electronic component manufacturers is around 5% to 10%. Sigmatron’s estimated annual ROA is within this range.

Return on Equity (ROE)

  • Metric:
    • ROE = Net Income / Stockholders’ Equity
    • To annualize the quarterly net income, we multiply it by 4: 3,883,611 * 4 = 15,534,444
    • Estimated Annual ROE = 15,534,444 / 57,553,519 = 26.99%
    • To annualize the quarterly net income, we multiply it by 4: 599,006 * 4 = 2,396,024
    • Estimated Annual ROE = 2,396,024 / 66,072,253 = 3.63%
  • Trend:
    • The estimated annual ROE increased from 3.63% to 26.99%.
  • Industry: The average ROE for electronic component manufacturers is around 10% to 15%. Sigmatron’s estimated annual ROE is above this range.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) – Basic and Diluted

  • Metric:
    • Three Months Ended January 31, 2025: Basic = $0.63, Diluted = $0.63
    • Three Months Ended January 31, 2024: Basic = $0.10, Diluted = $0.10
    • Nine Months Ended January 31, 2025: Basic = ($1.44), Diluted = ($1.44)
    • Nine Months Ended January 31, 2024: Basic = $0.15, Diluted = $0.14
  • Trend:
    • EPS (Basic and Diluted) increased from $0.10 to $0.63 for the three-month period, representing a 530% change.
    • EPS (Basic and Diluted) decreased from $0.15 to ($1.44) for the nine-month period, representing a -1060% change.
  • Industry: EPS varies widely based on company size and profitability. The increase in quarterly EPS is a positive sign, but the year-to-date EPS is concerning.

Liquidity

Current Ratio

  • Metric:
    • January 31, 2025: 150,288,638 / 122,446,752 = 1.23
    • April 30, 2024: 175,902,619 / 145,888,791 = 1.21
  • Trend:
    • The current ratio increased from 1.21 to 1.23, representing a 1.65% change.
  • Industry: A current ratio of 1.5 to 2 is generally considered healthy. Sigmatron’s current ratio is slightly below this range, indicating potential liquidity challenges.

Quick Ratio (Acid-Test Ratio)

  • Metric: Assuming inventory is part of current assets, we need to estimate inventory. Since it is not explicitly listed, we cannot calculate the quick ratio.
  • Industry: A quick ratio of 1 or higher is generally considered healthy.

Cash Ratio

  • Metric: Cash and cash equivalents are not explicitly listed, so we cannot calculate the cash ratio.
  • Industry: A cash ratio of 0.5 or higher is generally considered healthy.

Solvency/Leverage

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

  • Metric:
    • January 31, 2025: (122,446,752 + 12,986,843) / 57,553,519 = 2.35
    • April 30, 2024: (145,888,791 + 11,832,931) / 66,072,253 = 2.39
  • Trend:
    • The debt-to-equity ratio decreased from 2.39 to 2.35, representing a -1.67% change.
  • Industry: A debt-to-equity ratio of 1 to 1.5 is generally considered healthy. Sigmatron’s debt-to-equity ratio is high, indicating a high level of financial leverage.

Debt-to-Assets Ratio

  • Metric:
    • January 31, 2025: (122,446,752 + 12,986,843) / 192,987,114 = 0.70
    • April 30, 2024: (145,888,791 + 11,832,931) / 223,793,975 = 0.70
  • Trend:
    • The debt-to-assets ratio remained constant at 0.70.
  • Industry: A debt-to-assets ratio of 0.5 or lower is generally considered healthy. Sigmatron’s debt-to-assets ratio is high, indicating a significant portion of assets are financed by debt.

Interest Coverage Ratio (Times Interest Earned)

  • Metric: Interest expense is not explicitly listed, so we cannot calculate the interest coverage ratio.
  • Industry: An interest coverage ratio of 3 or higher is generally considered healthy.

Activity/Efficiency

Inventory Turnover

  • Metric: Inventory is not explicitly listed, so we cannot calculate the inventory turnover.
  • Industry: Inventory turnover varies widely based on the type of product and industry.

Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)

  • Metric: Accounts receivable are not explicitly listed, so we cannot calculate DSO.
  • Industry: DSO varies widely based on the company’s credit terms and collection practices.

Days Payable Outstanding (DPO)

  • Metric: Accounts payable are not explicitly listed, so we cannot calculate DPO.
  • Industry: DPO varies widely based on the company’s payment terms with suppliers.

Asset Turnover

  • Metric:
    • To annualize the quarterly net sales, we multiply it by 4: 71,067,863 * 4 = 284,271,452
    • Estimated Annual Asset Turnover (2025): 284,271,452 / 192,987,114 = 1.47
    • To annualize the quarterly net sales, we multiply it by 4: 95,919,888 * 4 = 383,679,552
    • Estimated Annual Asset Turnover (2024): 383,679,552 / 223,793,975 = 1.71
  • Trend:
    • The estimated annual asset turnover decreased from 1.71 to 1.47, representing a -14.04% change.
  • Industry: The average asset turnover for electronic component manufacturers is around 1 to 2. Sigmatron’s asset turnover is within this range.

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E)

  • Metric:
    • Current Stock Price: $1.04
    • Annualized EPS (2025): $0.63 * 4 = $2.52
    • P/E Ratio (2025): 1.04 / 2.52 = 0.41
    • Annualized EPS (2024): $0.10 * 4 = $0.40
    • P/E Ratio (2024): 1.04 / 0.40 = 2.60
  • Trend:
    • The P/E ratio decreased from 2.60 to 0.41.
  • Industry: The average P/E ratio for electronic component manufacturers is around 15 to 20. Sigmatron’s P/E ratio is significantly lower, potentially indicating undervaluation or investor concerns.

Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B)

  • Metric:
    • Market Cap = Shares Outstanding * Stock Price. Shares outstanding is not provided.
  • Industry: The average P/B ratio for electronic component manufacturers is around 2 to 3.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S)

  • Metric:
    • Market Cap = Shares Outstanding * Stock Price. Shares outstanding is not provided.
  • Industry: The average P/S ratio for electronic component manufacturers is around 1 to 2.

Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)

  • Metric:
    • Market Cap = Shares Outstanding * Stock Price. Shares outstanding is not provided.
  • Industry: The average EV/EBITDA ratio for electronic component manufacturers is around 10 to 15.

Growth Rates

Revenue Growth

  • Metric:
    • Three Months Ended January 31: (71,067,863 – 95,919,888) / 95,919,888 = -25.91%
    • Nine Months Ended January 31: (230,564,201 – 292,741,928) / 292,741,928 = -21.24%
  • Trend:
    • Revenue growth decreased by -25.91% for the three-month period.
    • Revenue growth decreased by -21.24% for the nine-month period.
  • Industry: Revenue growth varies widely based on market conditions and company performance. The negative revenue growth indicates a decline in sales.

Net Income Growth

  • Metric:
    • Three Months Ended January 31: (3,883,611 – 599,006) / 599,006 = 548.35%
    • Nine Months Ended January 31: (-8,872,218 – 889,367) / 889,367 = -1104.34%
  • Trend:
    • Net income growth increased by 548.35% for the three-month period.
    • Net income growth decreased by -1104.34% for the nine-month period.
  • Industry: Net income growth varies widely based on company performance and market conditions. The increase in quarterly net income growth is a positive sign, but the year-to-date performance is concerning.

EPS Growth

  • Metric:
    • Three Months Ended January 31: (0.63 – 0.10) / 0.10 = 530%
    • Nine Months Ended January 31: (-1.44 – 0.15) / 0.15 = -1060%
  • Trend:
    • EPS growth increased by 530% for the three-month period.
    • EPS growth decreased by -1060% for the nine-month period.
  • Industry: EPS growth varies widely based on company performance and market conditions. The increase in quarterly EPS growth is a positive sign, but the year-to-date performance is concerning.

⚠️ This is an experimental project and this report is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Conduct your own thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. ⚠️